News: NGOs wasted tsunami funds

Home News Photos News Videos News Cartoons News Blogs RSS

Home > Help and Aid > NGOs wasted tsunami funds

NGOs wasted tsunami funds

Aid agencies competing against each other wasted most of the funds given for tsunami relief efforts to Sri Lanka following the 2004 disaster, a report by researchers from RMIT and Monash universities in Melbourne, Colombo University in Sri Lanka and Madras University in India, and commissioned by AusAID has said according to The Australian newspaper.

Monday, Jul 12, 2010 | 478 Views | Comments [View/Post]

The researchers say that more than 500 aid agencies participated in the relief work in Sri Lanka alone, but many did not have experience in recovery after such a large-scale disaster, in which 230,000 people were killed in 14 countries.

The 385-page study says more care should have been devoted to the construction of temporary housing, because some of the resulting shelters housed families for up to four years, The Australian reported.

Martin Mulligan, director of RMIT's Globalism Research Centre and co-leader with Yaso Nadarajah, said unless governments and non-government organisations absorbed the lessons from the tsunami, "they will continue to repeat the same mistakes and waste a significant amount of global aid money".

He said examples of effective aid tended to be found where international NGOs formed strong partnerships with local community groups to ensure the aid was properly targeted.

"But we also found that a lot of post-tsunami aid money was wasted by aid agencies acting in haste, and in competition with each other," he said.

It says wastage resulted in part from "pressure from government, media and international funding bodies for quick results".

"In Sri Lanka, competitive aid agencies were often in a rush to complete the construction of new houses and settlements," it says.

The report lambasts "unimaginative, barrack-type" layouts for temporary housing and a "one-size-fits-all" approach, while praising a flexible template devised by World Vision.

It says: "Many agencies are reluctant to accept responsibility, despite so much evidence of poor construction."

The report says "only a community development strategy, rather than an asset replacement strategy, can give substance to the notion of 'build back better'."

World Vision chief executive Tim Costello said responding to the Boxing Day tsunami had been difficult and chaotic.

"That's how emergencies are," he said. "You just have to look at the complexity of the response to the Victorian bushfires last year to see the problems that can arise. We have teams whose sole responsibility is gathering the lessons from every emergency response, and asking 'how can we do this better?' "



Comment on this article
Guidelines: You must register with a social media account such as Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, etc. to comment on this story. Click on the "Login" button below to choose your login account of choice. We welcome your thoughts, but this is not an open forum. For the sake of all readers, please refrain from the use of obscenities, personal attacks or racial slurs. All comments must remain on topic and cyber bullying will not be tolerated. All comments are subject to our terms of service. Comments that do not comply may be removed. Repeat offenders will lose commenting privileges.
News Other Language
World News
Movie News
Information
Travel News